Government Doesn’t Provide Services To Rich People?
Friday, June 5th, 2009by Megan Pippet
Last week, California’s Director of Finance, Mike Genest, was quoted in the New York Time’s saying “Government doesn’t provide services to rich people. It doesn’t even really provide services to the middle class. You have to cut where the money is.” This is his response to the uproar, and borderline desperation, of people begging the government to refrain from making further cuts to life-sustaining programs serving the needs of the poor.
Anxiety continues to rise amongst St. Anthony’s guests and clients who are forced to sit and wait, wondering which of their services will be cut next and how devastating the cut will be. Quite frankly, I am sick and tired of hearing that cutting vital services such as senior programs, medical assistance services, education and meal assistance programs are the only solution to this budget crisis. CalWORKS, California’s welfare-to-work program is now the newest program on the chopping block. Faced with a real possibility of the program’s elimination, Mayor Newsom admits that California would “become the first state in the industrialized world to have no welfare system at all.” I am tired of the government balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.
Revisiting Mike Genest’s quote above, I echo the sentiments of Tim Redmond, found here in this week’s Editor’s Notes section of the San Francisco Bay Guardian: How can you say that the government doesn’t provide services to the rich and middle class? Who among those classes do not benefit from services provided by the government? Do the rich and middle class not send their children to public schools? Do they not ride MUNI to get to work? Do they not use public libraries or enjoy access to state parks? Do the rich not visit public museums and the middle class not enjoy the safety and security afforded them by the police and fire departments? Do they not mail letters through the postal service, bathe in water provided by the municipal water system or participate in events held in state convention centers? No, of course they do, but these and other programs are not those whose legitimacy are debated each time there are tough decisions to make. Cutting programs that are literally essential to the survival of hundreds of thousands of Californians is not a necessity, it’s a political choice. And, until we realize that, and start demanding that our legislators balance this budget with compassion, empathy and wisdom, the people of the Tenderloin, and the communities of people they represent across the state, will only continue to suffer.



