Support needed for AB 828!
Friday, July 1st, 2011by Colleen Rivecca
(Pictured: St. Anthony’s Advocate Franky and Assemblymember Sandre’ Swanson (D, Oakland) testify on behalf of AB 828)
St. Anthony’s has supported AB 828, the Nutritional Assistance for Families Act, and its goal to lift the lifetime ban on CalFresh (the new name for California’s “food stamp” program) assistance for people with prior low-level drug convictions. We have testified in support of the bill in front of both the Assembly and Senate Human Services Committees. because we believe that CalFresh benefits are critical for successful community re-entry and economic self-sufficiency. Denied these benefits, individuals who have already paid their debt to society are unable to secure nutritious food for their families.
AB 828 is currently stuck in the Senate Appropriations Committee on the “suspense file”. We need to ask the Chair of this committee, Senator Christine Kehoe, to support the passage of AB 828 out of the suspense file so that it can be voted on by the entire Senate.
Please join St. Anthony’s in supporting AB 828 by writing to Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Christine Kehoe. Hand written snail-mailed letters pack the most punch, but email is OK, too.
To send snail mail to Senator Kehoe, use this address:
The Honorable Christine Kehoe
Chair, Senate Appropriations Committee
State Capitol, Room 5050
Sacramento, CA 95814
To email the Senator, use this address: senator.kehoe@sen.ca.gov
Not sure what to say? Feel free to use our sample letter, below.
Dear Senator Kehoe:
I support Assembly Bill 828 (Swanson) and its goal to lift the lifetime ban on CalFresh assistance for people with prior low-level drug convictions.
Access to CalFresh benefits is critical for formerly incarcerated people to successfully re-enter their community and stay self-sufficient. Since people have already served their time, I think they deserve to qualify for CalFresh like any other individual. When formerly incarcerated people are unemployed or underemployed with no food assistance, it makes it harder for them to feed their family. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia have already restored nutrition benefits to this vulnerable population (USDA, June 2009).
For these reasons, I strongly support AB 828 and urge you and your colleagues to pass it out of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Sincerely,
(Your Name)

The following blog entry was written by Kendra Capece, Micah Fellow from
Although the “Great Recession” technically ended in 2009, hunger and food insecurity continue to be a problem for many Americans. For the past 60 years, the trends we’ve seen at St. Anthony’s
On Tuesday, January 25, St. Anthony Foundation joined advocates from around the state in Sacramento to speak with our representatives about hunger issues as part of California Hunger Action’s legislative leadership visit day. For our last legislative visit of the day, St. Anthony Foundation staff Colleen Rivecca and Celina Sutton joined with Western Center on Law and Poverty’s Jessica Bartholow and St. Anthony Foundation guest Franky Fardella to talk to Assembly member Tom Ammiano about the anti-hunger advocacy issues we would be working on this year.
A recent
What do we do now that the budget has left the Conference Committee and is in the hands of the Big 5? To answer that question, here’s an advocacy message from
Mark Leno took advantage of his place on the budget conference committee to propose eliminating the costly finger imaging system through the budget process rather than through the legislative process. The removal of the finger imaging system will take place if Governer Shwartzenegger signs off on the budget in the next few weeks.
St. Anthony Foundation advocates for public policies that will promote nutrition and healthy eating for all, regardless of income. We were very excited that two of the anti-hunger bills that we’ve supported for years were signed into law in 2008.
If you tell Barbara Coleman that there is a bill coming up in Congress that relates to poverty or hunger, her first response is, “When do we go? I need to talk to those people.”